How Friendly Are Dog Friendly Restaurants? Part 1

by Rod Burkert on February 2, 2010

Main Street - St. Charles, MO

The Throwdown -

I’ll be doggone if I ever eat at a restaurant that allows people to bring their canines to outside dining areas. So leads off a recent Dogs and Dining Just Don’t Mix blog post by Reginald Dogan, written in regards to a group of Pensacola, FL restaurants that are petitioning city council for an ordinance that would allow dogs to enjoy outdoor dining with their owners.  Here’s one of Mr. Dogan’s closing remarks: People who want to allow dogs in dining areas are like smokers who want to light up in dining areas. Both are potentially unsanitary and unhealthy to others, and they are often annoying and unpleasant for diners while eating. The blog indicated there were 23 comments, though I only saw 18.

Even more prolific, a Reader: I Want to Hang Out at Restaurant With My Dog post garnered 151 comments. Someone asked this of an Albany, NY food/ restaurant blog written by Steve Barnes:  I love food, and I love my dog. In the winter it is difficult to balance the two. I am writing because I was wondering if you know of any restaurants or bars that are dog friendly. The first sentence of Mr. Barnes reply:  Sorry, but you won’t find sympathy here. I love dogs. I loathe them in this context. The response goes downhill from there. The notable aspect of the post was that Mr. Barnes never answered the reader’s question, and only 4-5 comments provided a doggie dining option … 4 or 5 out of 151!

Before I go any further, I want to note for the record that I have no problem with either writer’s post. (Well, maybe Mr. Barnes could have answered the question before he started lobbing hand grenades.) It’s their blogs … they wrote what they felt … freedom of speech and all that.

Positive Reactions -

The Pensacola comments were decidedly for the petitioning restaurants (13 for, 5 against).  But the Albanians were not having any of it (62 against, 39 for, and 50 who bashed either Mr. Barnes or each other.)  Here is a sampling of the positive reactions from both blog posts:

  • I live downtown and walk my 5-lb. dog downtown. I try to plan our walks to end up at a restaurant with outdoor seating that allows dogs. It’s a great break for both of us, and it puts some cash in the restaurant till. I urge the city to let dog owners continue to support these dog-friendly owners.
  • I have a dog who can is very highly trained and well behaved. I do this so that I CAN take him places with me and be a non-disruptive force. He can sit/drop/stand indefinitely and always obeys commands. I doubt any child under the age of three could do this. He is also bathed regularly and doesn’t crap indoors OR in his pants, as toddlers/babies do. Give me a break. There should be nothing wrong with having restaurants in which dogs are permitted. If some people erroneously think this is a hygiene issue (stats, please) they can go to a different restaurant.
  • Doggie dining has been taking place around the state for over 3 years now and in most places, humans and dogs are mixing just fine, with no drama or angst. If Pensacola joins that list, its municipality and businesses will have yet another way to draw loyal visitors and customers.
  • It’s not that people can’t bear to leave their dog for 2-3 hours, it’s that the dog is a member of the family and people like to do things with their family.
  • I see both sides of the argument. I can understand why someone may not want eat lunch where there are dogs present if they’re not a fan of dogs. Fair enough. For those of us who enjoy a day out with our dogs, though, it’s nice to know there are places that allow dogs to hang out. I realize this is a privilege, not a right, and my dog and I act accordingly.
  • I don’t think all restaurants should allow dogs but I see nothing wrong with having some dog friendly establishments. If you don’t like dogs, don’t go to them. It’s all about having the choice. Taking your dog for a walk and stopping for a quick bite can make for a pleasant afternoon.  I’m also not sure why people think having a dog in a restaurant is automatically a health hazard.  It’s not a health hazard in your own kitchen and it doesn’t seem to be a health hazard for service dogs.
  • Like some of the other people have written, I don’t have a strong opinion either way, but I do think we should just allow the market to regulate it. I mean, if the law permitted it and someone decided to open up a dog-friendly restaurant, those who wanted to go could go and those who didn’t could choose not to.

Negative Reactions -

Brace yourself, because some of the negative comments are a little on the salty side.  That said, notice that several comments don’t offer reasons, just vitriol.  Kind of reminds me of a quote I once heard that goes something like: My mind is made up – don’t confuse me with facts.

  • Live animals, including birds and turtles, are to be excluded from food service operations. This exclusion does not apply to edible fish, crustacea, shellfish, or to fish in aquariums. Patrol dogs accompanying security police officers or guide dogs accompanying blind persons are permitted in the dining area. Straight from the NYS State Sanitary Code. I think the bigger issue is liability the owners of the restaurant could be liable if a dog inside of the restaurant bites someone.
  • I think it’s very inappropriate for people to even think of bringing their dogs into a restaurant, where others are going to be eating. At best it’s disruptive and at its worst it’s extremely unsanitary- what if Fido isn’t well enough trained to wait to get outside before doing his business?
  • Personally, I don’t mind dogs, but let’s not forget why it’s a health code violation. Many people are highly allergic to dogs.
  • As a dog owner you have to realize that some people hate dogs. It’s how it is, they are animals, they don’t belong in eateries.
  • Bars and restaurants are for people. If you want to eat and socialize with dogs (wtf???), you should grab a sandwich and eat it at the animal shelter.
  • Oh, and I bet the dog people who see no problem with bringing their animal to a restaurant are the same ones who allow their dogs to defecate in public with reckless abandon.  How about this: You can bring your dog to the restaurant where I’m eating if I can take a s#!t on your front porch, deal?
  • Really, it’s kind of goofy to bring a dog to a restaurant. If you want to share a meal with your pup, get some take-out and do it at home. Let doggie sit at the table with you, or bring your plate down to the floor to join him. Service animals are a different category. They are a physical necessity to their people, and I’ve never, ever seen a badly behaved service dog.
  • This is DISGUSTING. Why do I (a paying customer) want to sit next to YOUR DOG? How presumptuous of you to think that it’s ok for you to subject me to your animal nearby.
  • Unfortunately, just about anybody can become a dog owner, and plenty of those folks who don’t know how to train their dogs have no compunctions about bringing them to eating establishments.
  • I’d love it if people would leave their pets at home instead of inflicting them on the unwilling public, myself. I hate dogs, and my mom’s allergic to them, and many dog people don’t seem to care about either argument.
  • Don’t need to see dog licking its butt while I’m licking my chops.
  • Dogs in restaurants are great, until some thug walks in with his half-starved pit bull to terrorize everyone.

Pro Dog, Anti-Doggie Dining -

What REALLY surprised me was the number of dog owners that spoke out against pet friendly dining.  All of these comments came from the Albany post.

  • I like my dog, but I don’t want him at a restaurant with me. I want to relax.
  • As an owner of two dogs, I agree with the other dog owners who posted here and wouldn’t think of taking their dogs into restaurants. In some places, like France, the culture permits this; here, it doesn’t, and neither does the health code. Why push it?
  • I have 3 animals, including a dog. I love them dearly, but do not dine with them and wouldn’t force anyone else to either. I think taking a dog to a restaurant is a bit over the top and totally agree with Steve!
  • I’m a dog owner, and I love my dog’s company in dog fun like going for a walk, going to the park, or just hanging out watching tv with the fireplace on. All of those things have one thing in common – they are activities that a dog actually enjoys. Why would a dog want to sit on the cold floor of a bar or restaurant while his owner has dinner? That doesn’t sound like fun for a dog.
  • I am a crazy dog lover and when I had my dog (may she rest in peace) I took her to town meetings, farmers markets, etc.  She was an exceptional dog and very sociable and enjoyed visiting with people. But I would NEVER bring her to a restaurant.
  • I spoil my pet like no one’s business, but I have no desire to include her in my restaurant outings or take her in the car with me while I run errands.

Stay Tuned for Part 2 –

In my next post, I will try to make some order out of the the good, the bad, and the ugly … and offer suggestions to people who dine WITH pets and those who might be dining NEAR pets. In the meantime, what are your thoughts … your comments? Let us know!

  • Stumbleupon
  • Delicious
  • Google Buzz
  • I totally agree with Suzanne's comment. My dog is certainly better behaved than the average toddler and *nothing* is better than eating your meal while a child wails in the background. I don't get the big deal about letting a dog hang out on the patio while you're having a meal. Furthermore, I don't understand why dogs are considered a health hazzard in a restaurant, it's not like they're licking the dishes or walking over the food preparation tables. Whatever.
  • Love your candor! As I write in my post, I did not pull out the my-dog-is better-than-your-kid card ... though many people believe that to be true. I responded more fully to this thought at Michele's comment in Part 2 - hope you have time to read that post as well. As to your second point, I think there is a misconception among doggie dining opponents that humans can catch diseases from dog germs. I have not seen any studies that would support such a claim. Thanks for taking time out of your DoggieStylish duties to comment!
  • Joe Hewitt
    A business should be able to compete in any way they want as long as it does not negatively impact someone. Thus, if the city is willing to be flexible on their business codes, I think any business that wants to allow dogs in their establishment should be able to do so. Those who do not like to dine with others dogs around will have a happy dining experience elsewhere.
  • And I think that is a point I try to bring out in Part 2. I believe this economy has resulted in several cities' businesses making pledges to be dog friendly - Dallas, TX and Saratoga, NY come to mind. I also believe that opponents need to keep in mind that proponents are only asking for more outdoor dining options at this point (though a few more bars and cafes would be appreciated, too!). Lastly, the health code regulations that prohibit indoor dining may be outdated or poorly conceived to begin with. For example, there is an exception for service dogs. What if a group of 5 or so people with service dogs decided to dine together on a regular basis at one restaurant? Would be an interesting way to create change!
  • Ron
    I think, in this tough market, a dog-friendly casual place would be a very lucrative niche for an astute restaurant owner. It will take, however, a bit of policing to keep things under control as I could see the odd "out there" person bringing a totally "out there" dog in, and chaos quickly ensues...

    Also, I think there should be dog and non-dog designated tables laid out nicely so that people who don't like dogs can get to a table without walking past any.
  • See ... you are already possibility thinking about how this might work. It would not have to require a city/state law to regulate. And, it's all about choice. For people who prefer not to dine with/near dogs for whatever reason, they have options to eat elsewhere.
  • I don't think it's much of a sanitary issue and so long as the animals are behaved and the establishment allows them, dogs should be welcome. Most places here in Western Europe allow dogs almost everywhere and people seem to get on fine.
  • Thanks for commenting Anil. Sounds like you had a great time in Dublin for the HOSCARS. And I have a question for you. Having spent time in both places, do you believe dogs in Western Europe are better trained/behaved than dogs in the US ... which allows everyone "to get on fine"? Or is there something else you might attribute it to?
  • Yes, I've certainly noticed that. The dogs in Europe are (in general) very well behaved. I'm not sure what to attribute this to though. Dogs being walked are often on short leashes (or no leash at all) and people do seem to take them *everywhere*. Also walking is very common and the streets tend to be more crowded and busy - having an unruly dog would be a disaster.
  • I should add that I wouldn't mind hanging out with well behaved dogs while was eating, drinking and being merry. =)
  • Oooh, maybe a topic hotter than raw feeding!

    I'm not really sure where I sit on this topic I can understand both sides.

    There are more than a few dog owners that shouldn't be, for various reasons and they would definitely be the ones adding fuel to the "against" crowd's fire.

    I do think that if dogs were to be permitted in restaurants/bars/pubs etc, that it would probably make the most sense that these establishments have a patio and that dogs are restrict to those patios. Especially if the dog is eating a low quality kibble, if you know what I mean?

    I know that I would not be able to bring my Border Collie to a dog frindly bar or restaurant, her incessant whining drives me nuts at home and would completely stress me out at a bar or restaurant, as well every other patron. Of course there is absolutely NO WAY I'd be able to bring my "half-starved" pit bull either - he'd lick somebody to death for sure! :/

    Love the porch comment above, it wreaks (pun intended) of high level intellect. =P

    Great topic, looking forward to part 2.
  • Ron
    I am a pretty "hard core dog person" and I squeeze dogs into as much of our family as possible (I think it teaches the kids some good empathy lessons) but I do see a couple of the negative points, esp. with respect to "bad owners" or "out of control" dogs. A bar or a very casual restaurant I see as a way more appropriate place than formal, and there are dogs who would do well there, and those who wouldn't (I had a SchH3 Schutzhund GSD dog who would sit patiently under the table, guaranteed to not move, but his alert, whiny, "when can we go do something cool?" energy would drive everyone else NUTS :) )

    That said, I need some place to relax with a beer or a coffee and socialize a dog, so if you have a restaurant and are looking for a niche, there's a lot of us out there!
  • Thanks for your thoughts. Some of the negative reactions seem to assume that indoor, "nicer" restaurants are the targets of pet owners. Whereas, I believe most of us would be happy with bars and more outdoor dining options. BTW, we too have the whiny "when can we go do something cool" GSD. Hope you will come back tomorrow for the second part of this story.
  • Ron
    True enough about the nice restaurants, and also, if you read carefully, others seem to assume the dog will be DINING AT THE TABLE. It seems silly if you're a dog person, obviously it's just about the dog hanging out quietly while you're having a beer or whatever, but if you don't have any idea what dog people are like you may be imagining the waiter bringing out a plate of liver for "precious" to eat off the fine linens. :) Seems absurd, but read the neg. posts again ... I blame Disney movies for that idea, frankly. :)

    (as an aside, been using your site to plan a trip into NV, CA in a month or so, and I need a few more restaurant options -- so people in those areas who know of places, post 'em, please!! Thx!)
  • Hi Ron - this is Amy@GoPetFriendly. I am working on uploading a bunch of new restaurants right now - should be done by the end of the week - and quite a few of them are in CA! Hopefully this will give you some additional options!
  • Suzanne
    I'd like to take all those comments from the "Negative Reactions" category, and replace the word "dog" with "child/toddler/baby" because the same argument could be said for children in restaurants. Think people would get upset?
  • It does seem that kids get the benefit of the doubt, don't they. One comment from the Albany post that didn't get included in my summary talked about parents who put their toddlers/babies on restaurant tables (i.e., with exposed diaper). I'll have some rash with that :)
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: